The CSP office will be closed between Christmas and New Year (25 December-2 January).  If you need urgent advice during this period visit "Advice for members during the holiday closure"

Principles into practice: an observational study of physiotherapists use of motor learning principles in stroke rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective(s)

To describe a) how motor learning principles are applied during post stroke physiotherapy, with a focus on lower limb rehabilitation; and b) the context in which these principles are used, in relation to patient and/or task characteristics.

Design

Direct non-participation observation of routine physiotherapy sessions, with data collected via video recording. A structured analysis matrix and pre-agreed definitions were used to identify, count and record: type of activity; repetitions; instructional and feedback statements (frequency and type); strategies such as observational learning and augmented feedback. Data was visualised using scatter plots, and analysed descriptively.

Setting

6 UK stroke units

Participants

89 therapy sessions were observed, involving 55 clinicians and 57 patients.

Results

Proportion of time spent active within each session ranged from 26% to 98% (mean 85, SD 19). The frequency of task repetition varied widely, with a median of 3.7 repetitions per minute (IQR 2.1–8.6). Coaching statements were common (mean 6.46 per minute), with 52% categorised as instructions, 14% as feedback, and 34% as verbal cues/motivational statements. 13% of instructions and 6% of feedback statements were externally focussed. Examining the use of different coaching behaviours in relation to patient characteristics found no associations. Overall, practice varied widely across the dataset.

Conclusions

To optimise the potential for motor skill learning, therapists must manipulate features of their coaching language (what they say, how much and when) and practice design (type, number, difficulty and variability of task). There is an opportunity to implement motor learning principles more consistently, to benefit motor skill recovery following stroke.

Trial registration number

Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03792126).

Contribution of the paper

  • The findings from this study highlight opportunities for therapists to consider how they use verbal instructions and feedback in a specific and precise way, in order to support the process of motor learning. There is scope within routine clinical practice to use the many and varied types of feedback more robustly.
  • This study provides insight into how therapists apply motor learning principles stroke rehabilitation settings, and potential associations with a range of patient characteristics.